iOS 26 is trending everywhere—from the design refresh that makes your screen look like a glass sculpture to AI-driven live translations that turn your AirPods into real-time interpreters. Whenever Apple launches a new iOS version, the tech press focuses on shiny features. But for product managers, the real story is behind the curtain: how Apple decides what not to build is just as important as what ships.
Apple doesn’t publish its internal playbook. What we can do, however, is reverse-engineer their decision-making through product management frameworks—RICE, Kano, trade-off thinking—and see how some of the most valuable lessons apply beyond Cupertino.
The Scale of Apple’s PM Challenge
Apple’s PMs operate on a different order of magnitude:
- Billions of users across iPhones, iPads, AirPods, and CarPlay, each with their own needs.
- Hardware fragmentation: supporting old devices while pushing new ones.
- Regulatory pressure in the U.S., EU, and beyond.
- Fierce competition from Google, Samsung, and startups innovating faster on AI and software layers.
Each iOS decision isn’t just a UX tweak—it has ripple effects across hardware, ecosystems, and global compliance.
Liquid Glass Design
The “Liquid Glass” redesign introduces translucent, refractive UI elements across iOS. It’s sleek but controversial: some beta testers flagged legibility issues in Control Center.
Framework Lens: Kano Model
- For many users, a refreshed look is an “excitement” feature—it delights and signals freshness.
- But if usability drops (poor contrast), it risks sliding into “basic needs.” No one praises readable text, but everyone complains when they can’t see it.
Trade-off: Apple likely accepted a learning curve and some inconsistency (not all apps will adopt Liquid Glass immediately) in order to maintain brand differentiation and excitement. Reliability isn’t sacrificed—just aesthetics are nudged forward.
Live Translation with AirPods
iOS 26 introduces real-time translation across Messages, Phone, FaceTime, and even spoken aloud through AirPods.
Framework Lens: RICE Scoring
- Reach: Tens of millions of global travelers, students, and multicultural users.
- Impact: High—solves a universal pain point.
- Confidence: Apple’s prior work in on-device AI gives strong confidence.
- Effort: High, since it requires low-latency processing and multi-app integration.
Despite the heavy engineering investment, the RICE score tips it into “must-ship.” It also future-proofs Apple against Google Translate dominance and adds immediate ecosystem lock-in: why switch platforms if your AirPods make you multilingual?
Adaptive Power Mode
The new battery optimization system proactively dials back performance and brightness.
Framework Lens: Trade-off Thinking
- Gains: tangible utility for all users (longer battery life = fewer complaints).
- Cost: reduced responsiveness, which may annoy performance-sensitive users.
Apple’s bet: reliability beats speed in mass markets. For a billion users, “my phone lasts longer” is more valuable than “my animations feel snappier.” This echoes Apple’s broader philosophy: balance delight with trust.
What Didn’t Make It into iOS 26 (Yet)
Not every idea survived the cut. Some absences are just as telling:
- Deeper AR/VR hooks: Apple Vision Pro integration remains light in iOS 26. Likely deprioritized because Vision Pro adoption is niche, and Apple’s PMs know effort-to-reach ratio is low today.
- More radical AI assistants: Apple leaned into pragmatic AI (translation, smarter Shortcuts) rather than conversational “super-assistants.” Why? Because reliability matters more than hype—better to roll out constrained but dependable features than risk over-promising.
- Full design consistency: Liquid Glass isn’t uniformly applied across every app. Apple probably chose staggered adoption to reduce risk and give developers time to adapt.
This restraint shows an underrated PM skill: knowing when to say no.
Key Takeaways for PMs in Any Industry
- Balance delight with reliability. Excitement features like Liquid Glass must never undermine basic needs like readability.
- Think in opportunity cost. Every feature delayed (AR/VR hooks) freed resources for higher-impact wins (Live Translation).
- Hardware constraints are real. Just like Apple drops old device support, PMs in other industries must weigh legacy users against the future.
- Say no—loudly and often. Shipping everything dilutes quality. Apple’s focus is a lesson in ruthless prioritization.
Product management at Apple isn’t mystical—it’s disciplined trade-off navigation at scale. And whether you’re managing a startup app or a global platform, the principles remain the same: prioritize ruthlessly, measure impact, and never lose sight of the user experience.
Want to learn more about Product Management? Read more blogs!